Tuesday, September 13, 2005

More Awful Truth From Ex-Sprint Employee

Brian of the Catenema blog writes about his experiences as a former employee of Sprint

Why I dropped out of the corporate world

Last October I quit my job at Sprint. I had worked in telecom for 20 years, and for the first 18 or so, I really enjoyed the work. Then, about a year and half ago, it all changed. Things started to go horribly, horribly wrong. I didn't realize it at first. It took me a while to face the fact that my work- the work I once enjoyed and excelled at- was going to kill me if I didn't get away from it. I had to quit. Maybe you've been in a similar situation. Maybe you still are. If so, get out of the cubicle as fast as you can. I want to tell you about some of the things that led to my decision to walk away from a good job with a good company. This probably isn't the most entertaining blog entry, and certainly not that humorous, but I just gotta get this stuff off my chest, okay?

Why I quit:

Constant threat of layoffs - Managers exploited the fear of layoff to motivate employees to work harder, and to accept ridiculous expectations without complaining about them. Everyone struggled to work within the constant, lurking shadow of disapproval and the threat of losing credibility within the organization.

Expectation of lying to direct reports - When it came time for performance reviews, we were graded on a curve. That's a reality of business- I am sure many companies do this. It only makes sense- there's a limited amount of cash in the budget for bonuses and pay raises, so there has to be some way to allocate that money. Thus, there's a ratings curve. Everybody can't get the highest rating. Some people get good ratings, others get average ratings, and a few get poor ratings. We were told by our manager to deny the existence of a curve. If our direct reports were to ask about forced rankings, we were to tell them there was no such thing. Meanwhile, we would not even have the final say in what rankings we gave to our direct reports. Often their ranking was determined by a middle manager that had never even met the employees being ranked. It really didn't matter, as long as everything fit the curve- the curve that didn't exist.


Targeting certain employees for discipline - Once an employee made the slightest mistake, or was even perceived to have made a mistake, whether or not he or she actually did whatever it was, that employee's reputation was ruined for a very long time. Even a year or more later, previous transgressions, real or rumored, could be dug up at the worst possible times, such as during the yearly rankings and ratings sessions held by the supervisors and managers. One minor mistake could cost an employee a raise or bonus for two more years. I personally experienced this when trying to rate one of my direct reports. She was a stellar employee in every way, but because she was involved in a service outage two years prior, I had to go all the way to the vice president level to get approval to give her a favorable performance rating! Even then, supervisors in other departments, who didn't even know her personally but had heard rumors about the alleged incident, challenged the rating I gave the employee.

Half of the people I worked with were completely inept, and afraid of being found out. Many of my peers and colleagues had little or no experience in telecom. One particular "engineer" was a former cocktail waitress. She had been hired at Sprint by a manager who frequented the bar she worked in. One of my direct reports came to Sprint after working as a golf course landscaper. Another one had been in radio advertising sales. Another engineer ran a t-shirt silk screen business, and was a scuba instructor.

I was constantly second-guessed, constantly cross-examined, and treated like a child. Once, after staying late and spending 30 minutes patiently explaining a complex network issue to my boss's boss, she said she understood, thanked me for my time and left for the day. She then went outside to the parking garage and called my boss at his desk to tell him she didn't believe anything I had just told her, and demanded that he order me to check my facts with an individual she considered to be the subject matter expert on the particular topic. I did exactly as she asked, and the information I received from the "expert" was exactly the same as what I had previously given her. This was a huge waste of everyone's time.

Layoffs followed by open job postings - We backfilled nearly every laid off person's position with somebody new within 30 days.

Older workers were targeted for extra discipline and layoffs. Invariably, each round of layoffs would wipe out the over-40 employees. By the time I left, there were only 3 people in my department that were over 40, and two of them were under constant scrutiny from management, and undoubtedly targeted for the next round of layoffs. They both are going to get unsatisfactory performance ratings on their next yearly reviews. That was decided back in September, even though the reviews aren't given to employees until March of the following year.

Women are treated as second-class employees - In my group of 10 direct reports, the men made an average of $10,000 more per year than the women, all doing same job in same job title, with similar backgrounds, experience, education. The highest rated, most productive employees were the lowest paid members of the group. The lowest rated employee in my group actually had a base salary that was slightly higher than mine.

We would constantly get requests for various kinds of performance reports and statistics about the network- all based on whatever random thoughts popped into some ignorant middle manager's empty head. They seem to think that the way to make people more productive is to make them create a never-ending series of reports and graphs about their work performance, and about the performance of the network. We would be bombarded with report requests, and compiling the reports would take up most of our days and most of our weeks, to the detriment of any real work we might need to do. It is a completely passive-aggressive style of management. After a while, I realized that most of the reports we produced and sent out each week never got read or used by anyone. That was because the reports were meaningless in the first place, and by the time we got them done, whoever was asking for them had already forgotten about them and moved on to some other useless fire drill. Most of the time, it didn't matter whether I spent hours creating reports and graphs, or just said I would do them and then didn't do them at all. Nobody seemed to notice either way.

I started ignoring all e-mails and phone calls. I learned to ignore requests from other departments just long enough for the direction to change so that the request would be outdated and thus invalid. I never answered my telephone, preferring instead to let all calls go to voicemail. Over half the callers never left me a voicemail message, so I figured by not answering my phone, I was at least 50% more efficient (due to the work I avoided). I filed all e-mails, usually without reading them first. It didn't even matter one little bit. I avoided face-to-face meetings whenever possible, and never participated in conference calls.

After a while, this sick, dysfunctional environment just wore me down. I was getting migraines that lasted for weeks. I had irregular heartbeats that would wake me up in the middle of the night, or get so bad during the day I'd end up going to the emergency room, convinced I was having a heart attack. My doctor put me on antidepressant medication. I was having to chemically alter my brain just so I could get through a day at Sprint. I started to drop out of the workflow. I would arrive each day around 830 am, even though the workday started at 8. I would sit at my desk and read CNN, Drudge, and other news web sites. By mid-morning one of my direct reports might stop by to ask me some dumbass question or tell me about some minor problem they were having. I'd pretend to be interested, act like I was listening, and say whatever I needed to say to get them to go away. If I needed to promise to escalate an issue to another department, or help them solve some technical problem, or get answers for them about some company policy or procedure, I'd agree to do so, just to get them to go away and leave me alone. I avoided my direct reports as much as possible. I started sleeping at work - a LOT. If nobody was looking for me, or if my boss was out of his office in a meeting, I'd sneak off to the "quiet room". The quiet room is simply a small, windowless room with a recliner in it. It is really for use when an employee isn't feeling well, to give them a quiet, dark place to go rest for a few minutes. You can go in, bolt the door, turn off the lights and stretch out for a peaceful work nap, with no possibility of intrusion, since nobody can see who is in the quiet room once the door is locked. Usually I would drift off to sleep for 30 to 60 minutes at the most, but one time I woke up from a really good work nap and found that I had been out for nearly 3 hours. I got up, rubbed my eyes, left the quiet room and walked back to my desk. I was relieved to find that nobody had missed me, or looked for me, or even noticed I had been gone. I often wondered if they knew where I was during these work naps. Since the quiet room was in another part of the building, my direct reports and peers couldn't see me coming and going from there. On a really bad day, I'd have a mid-morning nap, followed by a two hour lunch, followed by a mid-afternoon nap. Then I'd sneak back to my desk for an hour or so before leaving early to go home. The really disturbing part of all this was, nobody seemed to notice. I continued to get the highest possible performance rating, and the highest possible raise, all while doing nothing. I did this for the better part of a year before I finally resigned.

/end anecdote

Gee Sprint... do you think _this_ might have something to do with the shitty customer service? If you treat your employees like crap, and basically your company practices borderline personality disorder as a management style and practice, maybe this is harming customer service? Ya think?


14 Comments:

Blogger Johnny Canuck said...

Now you've got me thinking. I really enjoy this blog, I'll definitely pop around more often, keep it up!

Feel free to pay a visit to my Canada immigration site. It might not be your "cup of tea", but it covers Canada immigration related topics.

1:10 AM  
Blogger sarah said...

I really liked the information on your blog about silk screen I have my own silk screen exposedblog if you would like to come and see what I have on mine

2:51 AM  
Blogger marissa said...

I really liked the information on your blog about silk screen I have my own silk screen exposedblog if you would like to come and see what I have on mine

3:04 AM  
Blogger emily said...

I appreciate your information on silk screen. I just bookmarked your site and will be back regulalry to keep on top of it. Please check out my blog on silk screen exposed - I'd really appreciate it

3:08 AM  
Blogger analytics said...

Thanks. This is starting to make sense to me now. My BLOG is rapidly becoming a Sprint Sucks blog since I signed up for EVDO about a month ago.

It's amazing actually.

4:09 PM  
Blogger midkemia said...

:scare:

The History of Sprint: Layoffs followed by open job postings – Sprint is known for backfilling nearly every laid off person's position with somebody new within 30 days. So do not worry about the layoffs coming this month.

Older workers were targeted for extra discipline and layoffs. Invariably, each round of layoffs would wipe out the over-40 employees. Look at the law suit Sprint just lost that proves this.

Well guess what, Sprint has found a new way to get rid of employees over the age of 40. They confiscate their computers and look to see if they have used the asset for anything other than Sprint Business; such as reading the Kansas City Star; viewing picture on Kodak.com; or SprintPCS.com or accessing someone’s Myspace page. How do I know this?? I work within Network Services and have access to the groups within HR that have been working closely with the Legal team to terminate the employee without any course to defend them selves. Yes Sprint has started informing the employees about the strict policies concerning email usage, but it only applies to individual contributors, not management. How do I know this? I personally received the email in question that caused the 20 people to be terminated; this email, funny yet I guess it would be cause to talk to the individual, is no reason to fire some. But wait....I am 30, a manager and make less than 70K a year. Amazing how our executives will reduce cost by cutting the nose off the face to spite themselves. I guarantee a layoff is coming at the end of the month.

Just ask around my fellow bogglers, you will hear about the Nazi storm trooper techniques being deployed at Sprint to scare employees to turn on themselves. The ethics hotline is working overtime. Can we start saying penny stock options for executives???

Count down to October/November layoffs…..

More to come…

10:09 AM  
Blogger LZ said...

Goodness. I read your report and realized I had many of the same experiences in my short stint as a manager at Sprint. Luckily, I worked remotely in a field office, but my contacts at Corporate were much the same.

My favorite Sprint tactic is their MBA/Senior Management development program. Have you heard of it? Sprint actually goes around to the "best" MBA programs in the country and recruits graduates (or at least they used to when I worked there). They then put these recent grads - often with ZERO actual work experience - in charge of entire departments. Often, they will be sandwiched in between a layer of Managers and a VP as a Director, where they would spent a pre-determined length of time in rotation (6 - 12 months) before being reassigned to a new department/task.

In my experience, all the Managers at the corporate department with whom I interfaced were much more experienced than the MBA grad to whom they reported. We were lucky when they had someone who was at least open-minded and willing to learn from the experience of those of whom he was in charge and/or working with. (Yes, you're also right in that nearly all members of Sprint upper management are male.)

My then-VP at the time in the field, who had been inherited from a company acquired by Sprint (and one of the best acquisitions they've ever made, albeit unintentionally) used to call the Sprint upper management "H.Y.P.E." (Havard/Yale/Princeton/Emory)

My own experience helping them launch the now-defunct division, which shall remain nameless (many of those members of management who did a really good job are still working for Sprint, to the best of my knowledge) was as follows:

1) Sprint spent millions of dollars researching the technology we deployed. (According to our Sr. Engineer, this was the third or so project on which he had worked where Sprint sunk millions in R&D and then pulled the plug.)

2) Sprint launched the division, cracking the whip over a spending frenzy where we couldn't spend it fast enough in order to acquire the insane level of new customers they hoped to achieve in year one. A few hundred million more dollars spent in marketing efforts.

3) The technology did not work ideally in all markets, and had a high cost of deployment per add (not including marketing efforts and R&D).

4) At some point, we found out our division was on the same development path as another division (where we started with different products but were both projecting to end up with the same product after 10 - 15 years' time)... the rival division was much larger and more powerful than ours. (Gulp.)

5) After about a year of this, a recession started to hit that impacted Sprint in a big way. They started to actually count all the money we were spending, and put our entire division on "hold" (even for office supplies) until they could get a clear understanding of how much money we had spent in the current fiscal year.

6) A month later, Sprint started closing field offices in the smaller or lesser-performing markets.

7) About a month after that, Sprint decided to suspend all operations of our division, laying everyone off except a skeleton crew of support staff to service the existing customers.

The story was they were working on the 2G version of our product's technology and would re-launch at that time. I doubted they ever would (they haven't). Sure enough, the rival division has gone on to successfully market their own version of what was anticipated ours would have offered, at least it is VERY similar.

So, there's my own sad story! Not quite as bad as yours because my GM and Regional VP were awesome guys, still my favorite bosses to this day.

I'm very very glad I never had to work in Overland Park.

Good luck with your new life! I am anxious to hear in what direction you proceed.

1:49 PM  
Blogger LZ said...

PS - the primary reason they gave for pulling the plug on our division was because the cost to acquire each new customer was too high. The irony of this was we in the field were advising those at corporate all year that we were spending too much money - I myself often thought unnecessarily. They answer we continually received was to spend more more more, we couldn't spend enough money, our only thought was to add these xxx new customers by xxx time.

So... in other words, Sprint asked us to do the very thing they later decided had doomed our product.

1:57 PM  
Blogger LZ said...

OH! I skipped a step.

4a) Our division absorbed another division with a similar product (but different deployment method) that had been around longer than ours, but was tanking due to extreme problems with its own deployment method and faulty technology.

2:01 PM  
Blogger Starks said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

5:00 PM  
Blogger Starks said...

I presently work for the company and due to Some unforeseen issues i feel as though I am being pushed out by the management in the store and I almost feel like there is nothing I can do but take it. I have been with the company for 4 years and had moved up to a lead is a short time even passing up 4 and 5 year veterans at my position as tech. I really loved my job but there were management changes ans this brough about a lot of turmoil and backstabbing among the employees, The staff is in no way professional. There is constant loud talk and profanity in the break room that customers on the floor can hear and its has just turned into a horrible place to be from a job that I lived sooo much. I have recently been singled out as I am not one to take mistreatment in the horizontal position and they are taking the rules and using them against me, scheduling me in a as as to make me miss my quotas such as the last three days of the month. I am being scrutinized ever so thoroughly and am currently on a final as they have compiled all that they have against me to use at their will. I am the best at what I do and the oddest part of this is that I constantly do my coworkers job, but I feel as though since i threaten the higher ups and I am confident about it, they want me out. My coworker have overheard them talking about getting me out and writing this and that up which sharing that info is a violation in itself. Im constantly stressed about this and am awaiting the day which In sure will be soon that they find a way to oust me from my spot. If anyone knows of anything that I can do or have any advice Id love to hear it.

5:15 PM  
Blogger Starks said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

5:16 PM  
Blogger Starks said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

5:16 PM  
Blogger Maxyella said...

I worked for Sprint Call center in Bristol Va, I'm Hispanic with spanish being my 1rt language, I was hire and wasen't told,they didn't have Spanish gate, I was told I was not to handle spanish calls and had get White Glove, to trnsalate calls,felt trapped, not being able to help customers make me feel bad every time i go a spanish call and had to tell the customer I wasn nto able to assist in spanish,I was strugling with my handle time, like many others there was this one time were I had been working 12 of OT,and it was time to go home, I was tired and alredy 25 minutes over my schedule time,got a call tru I'd already signed off the CS information system, as it was over my schedule time, I disconected call,thinking it would be ok,a floor especilist seeing what I did,told on me, I was put on a verbal warning and on an action plan for 90 days as it's considered Call Avoidance,becausue I Admitted doing it because I was tired and wanted to go home,I was not terminated My Team Lead, at the time said I was a good employee, I made a mistake he would talk the director and give me a chancer to stay.. I never dicsonected another call after that. however this year since the Big storm we had in April, 2011. Sprint Network is bad, customers are not to call out, receive calls, calls drop, not able to access WEB or TXT, and many other issues going on. July 24,2011 someone cut optic cable near Bristol call center, disabled all system for at 4 hours, after that it got worst.
the same day that happened a new telephone system was introduce,the change took palce while system was down. we got sheet explaining how to signed on and off,that was it. I was tryint to figure how to work that damn device on, I went to 3 diferent floor supervisor they all told me the same thing, about setting device to release a call to set device on idle to get to brakes and stuff ( press the released button, and that gets you off the phone then you hit sign off and enter the code) what that did was not my solution, it hung up on call. I was having other System issues as well, many of my calls were not coming tru, I got a call and as I was greeting caller, call disconected, many callers that came tru would say,they were not able to hear me, with caller not being able to hear me I had to disconect the call, or transfer the call to the Employee care. I figure it was something to do with the system so I brought it up to a Team Lead , As my Team leader was on vacation for the second time that month, He said that I had to wait for her to come back from vacaton, it took tow weeks,first day my team lead was backe, I went to her with my issue, however it wasen't resolved inmediately, I had to wait a whole week,and very same day she came back with a new headset replacement,Friday August 12,2011 3 hours later I was called to the conference room to be terminated for disconecting calls. withing 10 to 16 seconds they said it Call Avoidance so they had top let me go. I really think that I was railroaded, no otne took the time to take care of my issue. Worst of all it's that they make you fell like you're a criminal walked you out the door, your not allowed to go back and get your get you personal stuff,I apply for unemployment after working for 33 yeard I never in my entire life collected unemplyment before, my benefits are denied,I have no proff their network is bad,that calls systematically disconect I know it happens to other people as well,all the time, Is there anyone out there that can help me, I need witnessed or even statements from people that know what Im saying is afact. I use to loved my job till I was terminated I was a loyal employee tried hard to meet company requirement still that wasen't enough,I just want my unemployment benefits, so I can survive untill I find another job, don't have second income, help would be apreciated, I'm appealing the Unemployment Deputies decition Guilty of Misconduct, not eligible for unemployment benefits.

1:09 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

More blogs about Customer+Service.
Technorati Blog Finder

This blog is not owned nor operated in any fashion with Sprint, or any Subsidiary of Sprint. All claims, representations and such are the subjective opinions of those people who have made these complaints about Sprint, and not Sprint itself.